The Art of the Possible: Why Forcing Customers to Change Channel to Pay Is Breaking Your CX
By Matt Taylor, Head of Solution Consulting, IPI
For years, Contact Centers have invested heavily in customer experience (CX). Journey mapping, omnichannel strategy, AI-driven routing, conversational design and agent empowerment have all become standard priorities. Yet despite this progress, one moment continues to quietly undermine otherwise well-designed journeys: payment.
Too often, payment is where customer experience fragments. Not because the technology is lacking, and not because compliance makes it unavoidable, but because payment is still treated as something that sits outside core journey design. As a result, security becomes highly visible at the very moment it should disappear.
Ultimately, if a customer has to change channel to pay, the CX journey has already failed. But how can organizations redesign payment journeys to keep security invisible?
Where Payments Quietly Drop Out of Journey Design
Most organizations follow a familiar pattern. CX teams design journeys first. Voice and digital channels are optimized for engagement, containment and resolution. Only later does payment enter the conversation.
At that point, constraints appear. Compliance concerns surface. Timelines tighten. Payment becomes something that must be added in rather than designed through.
The result is that channel shifting becomes normalized. Customers may start in chat but are pushed to voice to pay. Interactive Voice Response (IVR) journeys redirect customers to portals. Agents pause conversations to initiate workarounds. At the moment of intent, the experience changes and security becomes visible. This is often framed as a technology limitation, whereas in reality, it is a design decision.
Why The Problem Is Accelerating
Several industry trends are making this issue more visible and more costly. AI and automation for example are accelerating channel rollout. Additionally, new digital entry points are being launched faster than ever, often without end-to-end payment consideration. As organizations expand across voice, chat, messaging, social and web, journeys are becoming increasingly fragmented.
Each new channel adds complexity. Each shortcut compounds friction and risk.
The implication is simple. Every customer contact channel must be payment-enabled by design. If payment is treated as a downstream concern, friction becomes inevitable and security becomes intrusive.
The Cost of Getting It Wrong
When payment becomes a hand-off rather than an integrated step, the impact is felt across three dimensions.
From a CX perspective, abandonment increases at the point of commitment. Trust erodes when customers are redirected or interrupted, and confidence drops precisely when organizations need it most.
Operationally, failed or redirected payments drive repeat contact. Agents therefore spend longer handling exceptions, and the manual processes that emerge to “help customers through,” increasing cost and effort.
From a control perspective, exceptions increase, processes become more complex, and audits take more time. Teams spend energy explaining why some journeys differ instead of showing consistent results
At scale, these patterns become systemic. What started as a tactical workaround quietly shapes future risk.
What Successful Organizations Do Differently
Across regulated sectors, a clear pattern is emerging among organizations that are succeeding.
First, they enable in-channel payment completion Whereby customers pay at the moment of intent without being transferred, redirected or delayed.
Second, they apply consistent controls across channels. The same PCI control model underpins voice, IVR, speech recognition and digital payments. Evidence is consistent across channels, and therefore outcomes are predictable.
Third, they reduce exceptions and workarounds. By designing payment as part of the journey rather than a bolt-on, operational drag falls and audits become quieter.
The common thread is a shift in mindset. PCI is treated as a capability, not a project, and security is designed to be invisible to the customer.
PCI as a Capability, not a Constraint
There is a persistent misconception in the industry that PCI compliance is the differentiator. It is not. Almost every provider can help an organization achieve compliance.
What differentiates outcomes is whether that compliance can be delivered without breaking the journey or making security visible to the customer.
Modern PCI frameworks were never intended to force customers into unnatural behaviors. Their objective is to protect sensitive data while enabling commerce, not to interrupt conversations or fracture journeys.
When PCI is embedded into journey design, security becomes invisible to customers and provable to auditors. Scope shrinks rather than shifts, and controls remain stable even as CX evolves.
What “Good” Payment Journey Design Looks Like
Many organizations do not deliberately design poor payment experiences. Instead, they make decisions that feel fast in the moment.
New channels are launched without payment design to meet deadlines, and payment is retrofitted later under pressure. A single payment approach is forced across multiple journeys to simplify delivery. Each decision appears reasonable in isolation. Collectively, they create fragility and make security increasingly visible for customers.
Static PCI thinking struggles to keep pace with dynamic CX evolution. This is where control drift sets in, and the cost of change rises. Audits thereby become harder, not because controls are weak, but because they are inconsistent.
In mature environments, several design principles are consistently present. Payments are enabled by default, and journeys are designed with completion in mind, not containment alone.
Customers do not notice security because it has been designed to be invisible. What they notice instead is confidence; the experience feels natural, uninterrupted and trustworthy.
Moreover, from an internal perspective, exceptions are fewer. Evidence is cleaner, and audits focus on outcomes rather than explanations. Crucially, these organizations are not choosing between CX and compliance. They are aligning them.
Channel-Agnostic, By Design
A channel-agnostic PCI capability does not mean identical experiences everywhere. Rather, it means consistent control regardless of channel.
Voice payments allow customers to pay securely while staying with the agent, and IVR enables completion without agent involvement. Secure speech captures payment details without breaking conversation flow, and digital channels support in-channel payment through chat, links or embedded web experiences.
The customer experience adapts to context. The security model does not. This architectural consistency allows organizations to scale CX without scaling risk.
Asking the Difficult Question
There is a simple question every CX and Contact Center leader should be asking: Where are customers adapting to your payment design today?
Every forced channel change, repeated explanation or unexpected delay is a signal. Not of non-compliance, but of misalignment between CX ambition and payment reality.
The future of Contact Center payments is not about adding more controls. It is about making security invisible by design. When payments are embedded into the journey, abandonment drops, trust increases and operational complexity falls. Compliance becomes quieter. Value becomes clearer.
This is the art of the possible; not by removing security, but by designing it properly
You can return to the February 2026 Newsletter here too!